• crispyflagstones@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    They’re probably going to find themselves having to explain what it means that a social media platform is itself engaged in speech, instead of functioning as a platform for others to speak. TikTok users, whose voices are allegedly curtailed by the ban, aren’t exactly prevented from going to another platform.

    If they say that it’s Tiktok’s speech that’s curtailed, they’re going to have to explain carefully how they’re not a foreign influence operation.

    The language of the first amendment is pretty stark, but the courts have always understood it has various limits.

    • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      they’re going to have to explain carefully how they’re not a foreign influence operation.

      McCarthyism’s back baby!

          • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            They never thought it was a bad thing; they just put it back under the log that they hide their racism, genocidal bloodthirst, and unearned arrogance-- wait, they still call that “Exceptionalism”.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Uh yeah? Destroying people’s careers and lives just because they might be a communist is a massive breach of our rights.

        • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Sounds like some progressive commie hippie dippie talk!

          Type a 2,000,000 word essay on why democrats are better then Republicans and say “Joe Biden is the most pro union president in American history” 69 times as penance for your transgressions against the congregation.

          /$