• Gork@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    How did this get normalized? Why is this even something that is even considered debatable? As a society, feeding our children should be the first priority.

    I’m flubbered.

    • Ghostalmedia@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Echo chambers that reinforce the lie that democrats want to take your money to pay for irresponsible people’s children.

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe they are irresponsible, but that’s not their kids fault. Feeding kids regardless of who their parents are, is a basic morality thing.

      • gogozero@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        i understand its a bullshit argument, but even if were true, idgaf why kids dont have food, i want them to get food one way or another

        • tangentism@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, sweeping chimneys and working night shifts in abattoirs is a good way of acquiring the money for it!

          /S

    • Mummelpuffin@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally everyone in this comment section is missing “regardless of the individual eligibility of each student”. Everyone is getting hysterical over something that isn’t even in the cards.

      Of course a lot of kids rely on free school lunches and they aren’t trying to take that away. They’re trying to restrict free lunches to kids with parents who are actually incapable of feeding them. If parents can afford food for their kids, feed your fucking kids.

      • offthecrossbar@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m admittedly not familiar with how the program works but I suspect that “totally bulletproof and unbiased eligibility criteria that can’t / won’t be weaponized against specific people groups” isn’t something that it guarantees