![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
How? How do they profit off someone who refuses to view ads?
How? How do they profit off someone who refuses to view ads?
Who would pay for data on a person you can’t advertise to?
I don’t think they’ll care or miss you, to be honest. It’s not like they’re making money off you.
I wonder if there is a job where you test user interfaces by deliberately misunderstanding instructions? I feel I’d be good at it.
Immediately, our team went to the dam to open the gates. Before they could open, the flash flood hit them, and they ran away to save their lives
I’m surprised they had to send a team to open the gates, I’d have thought this could be done remotely.
They’re pulling older and older pieces of equipment out of storage, fixing it up, and sending it out.
They’ve given up trying to bombard Ukraine with naval assets, and surrendered the offshore oil platforms they were using as observation platforms.
They’re flying fewer and fewer sorties, the ones they do fly typically lob missiles from beyond the border, and they’re seeing mechanical failures because the few aircraft they do have are not being properly maintained.
The lack of equipment is definitely hurting them, make no mistake about that.
Unfortunately, they have no shortage of young men to send to their deaths.
So I could move to bumfuck nowhere and get paid to chill out in my car, while my coworkers pick up my slack?
No, that’s Alice’s problem.
It sounds like an incentive not to hire people who live too far away from the office to me.
Because the simplest option for the company is not to hire Bob.
Bob chose to live and work where he does, he can live with the consequences of his choices.
I don’t feel sorry for bob.
Who would hire Bob, in that case?
So either move house or move job then.
They have the choice of paying for the convenience of living close to work, or spending time commuting. That’s not something an employer will or should care about.
Is this their time as well, or just travel costs?
The answer is they don’t compensate them, because that would be silly.
Why would an employer care how far away their employees live, or compensate them for their travel?
Unless the employer also gets to decide where they can and can’t live, why should they compensate them?
Realistically, a government couldn’t notify every single map maker, but my view is that the map maker should be obliged to act when notified.
In the case of paper maps, if they were notified of the bridge, and proceeded to publish a new version of the map showing it as operational, then yes, they should face consequences. paper maps don’t provide turn by turn directions though, so less safety critical.
Not an obligation to proactively update the map, but if someone notifies them about a closure or other safety issue, in my view they have a duty of care to act.
No, but having a handful of people who will never see their ads devalues the whole package.