![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
The comparison in this case is operating on the word half, not on the subject of the sentence:
Only half want to get married, even less [than half] want kids.
Consumables are always the best gifts. I don’t even bother with anything else anymore, unless it’s something that I made myself because then it has sentimental value.
So the developers claim, but the users still encounter it, and the bug report stays open for 22 years … possibly more.
Caffeine is pretty well studied and it’s known that the long term health effects are nothing close to cocaine. I doubt if there was any good science back then on the long term effects of cocaine, let alone enough education for the populace to know and understand it.
However social perceptions may change anyway. What we consider as not serious may be considered much more serious in the future. For example many people get headaches or even migraines as a withdrawal symptom of caffeine, and we don’t consider a headache to be serious.
But I saw a Star Trek episode once where Picard gets a headache and it was a big deal because those had been solved for hundreds of years by that time! Turns out the ferengi were controlling his mind or something. So caffeine may be considered a serious drug in the future if it interferes with the detection of alien mind control devices.
Can you cite a case where an American company with no holdings or dealings in the EU was fined successfully?
If the company has no infrastructure within the jurisdiction of the gdpr, how can they hope to enforce it?
And what jurisdiction does the gdpr have over servers hosted in America?
We’re all still waiting for the court case that sets this precedent.
My favourite is the “upload your genitals as jpeg”
Huh, interesting. I didn’t realize Dassaults makes both solidworks and catia.
It’s made by Seimens, the industrial equipment manufacturer. IIRC it’s one of the oldest CAD systems there is, from the 80s when they started developing it in house for their own use.
It’s just the simplest way to explain extrusion.
“A profile through which material is pushed, forming a part of uniform section and indeterminate length” just confuses people. But then you say “ya know those playdoh things?” And they instantly understand.
Here’s some popular content
They don’t even try to show you anything relevant. “Here’s some random shit, watch it instead.”
Damn that’s gonna be slow.
But I guess speed was not a criterion.
They’re not telling individuals what they’re allowed to talk about. These are rules for official company marketing communications.
We may not agree with their stance, but they are well within their rights here.
Did they actually issue a subpoena though, or did they just send some emails saying “give pls”.
A subpoena is a legal document and thus there are rules that go along with it. But an email asking to be given something is not a subpoena.
they develop community-based committees which have no actual power in themselves but are used to develop concensus on issues that affect the whole community. So rather than abolishing all rules they’re all about human collaboration and concensus.
So it’s a democracy.
You were foolish to have ever given it up in the first place.
What are the legal implications of doxxing a person here? I can think of a few people I’d like to slap on that list, but it doesn’t seem risk free for me.
Don’t you mean “this!”?
That’s some solid reframing, bro 👍