Who killed them reuters? Did they just simultaneously spontaneously cease living? Why didn’t you put who killed them in the headline?
Who killed them reuters? Did they just simultaneously spontaneously cease living? Why didn’t you put who killed them in the headline?
Anyone else like food when they’re extremely hungry?
US control your boy Israel before it starts shit it can’t finish.
I’m sure it was a free, fair and open election where all candidates had equal opportunity to campaign and run and no groups were restricted from voting as they wished /s.
They were missing some punctuation when the made that statement it should actually read “rules-based? International order!”
Because Biden and the US state department wants this.
Israel is a ‘democracy’
Mr Biden put a big sticker on them saying ‘not for war crimes ❤️💋❤️💋’ so it’s all good.
During special moments, first flight, captain retiring etc, they’ll do what’s called a water cannon salute. Fire trucks will park opposing each other and create a water bridge for the plane to taxi through.
Terrorism. They are doing terrorism.
This is why I’m no longer buying iPhones or other smartphones as much as I used too.
I’ll believe it when the reactors are up and running. Ghana has been trying to get nuclear power since the days of Nkrumah.
More like world gestapo if anything
Unless you desperately need more government funding. Then you’ll concoct a missile gap or something.
The ghouls making the money right now will be deep in the ground in a few decades. They don’t care.
We have a climate emergency. Rather than buying huge number of cheap solar cells to rollout huge solar projects the US would rather just block them from entering its country.
Israel has the right to defend itself against mothers carrying their children.
Lol reuters got the story so wrong. They were so confident that the growth figures would be below expectations. I can’t stand their reporting on China’s economy. It’s so bad.
Some executives in a defense contractor have made a killing on those glitchy drones.
It’s important enough to have in the first paragraph of the article. Why not have it in the headline? The reality is that many people do not even read the article. The headline not only has a role in capturing the attention of readers but is often the extent of information people receive? Saying ‘Israeli strike’ is only two more words. Why did reuters not include it. It’s naive to think there isn’t a propaganda spin to not mentioning it in the headline.