Do you have experience with Spanish employment law?
Do you have experience with Spanish employment law?
You can’t just compare the file sizes without looking at the quality. Each will have different quality loss depending on the exact encodings used.
What is “southern Ireland”? Do you mean Ireland?
“Gen Z simply uses technology more than any other generation and is therefore more likely to be scammed via that technology.”
raid is essential anyway
Why? If there are offsite backups that can be restored in an acceptable time frame, what’s still the point of RAID?
It seems like this order is rather limited and the IA can continue almost all of their work.
If you turn the fan up high enough it will blow the heat from outside into the house. Trust me, I’m a scientists.
Applying AI-voodoo to a non-existing problem with unknown side effects? Sign me up!
It’s not. Image hosting sites have existed for decades. Websites are not liable unless they have actual knowledge of illegal content and ignore takedown requests. Stop fearmongering.
Good. Hopefully this will discourage people from using Clownflare’s DNS.
In case you don’t know, Cloudflare already controls a massive amount of websites, have access to their unencrypted traffic and are making the web inaccessible for people who use tor or noscript. They are a threat to the open web.
Because people are blowing this way out of proportion. Users uploading illegal content is always part of hosting a platform and lawmakers realized this decades ago. Platform hosters legally cannot be held liable for the content of their users unless they have actual knowledge of specific instances of illegal content. This is both in the US (section 230 of the Communications Decency Act) and the EU (chapter II of the Digital Services Act, previously the eCommerce directive)
Communication network providers in the EU generally aren’t liable for illegal activity of their users.
While it’s stupid that ISPs are using their monopolies to screw consumers, the concept of data caps is not as stupid as you might think.
You’re not just paying for the connection between you and the ISP, but also all the other data links that get your internet traffic to its destination. For example, those cables across the ocean are owned third parties and they charge money for every byte that goes through. It wouldn’t be unreasonable for ISPs to pass that cost to users.
Furthermore, most links are overprovisioned in order to keep costs down. For example, if you assume that users only use 10% of their bandwidth on average, that means you can fit 10x as many people on a connection (or maybe 8x to account for peaks). This does mean that users should be discouraged from using their full bandwidth for long durations, otherwise the network operators can’t overprovision as much and have to invest more in infrastructure.
For the last time: these language models are just regurgitating what people have said. They don’t analyze or reason.
It’s what the ePrivacy directive says, yes. But some get around this by claiming that it’s necessary for the operation of the device/service (doubtful) or that it has limited effect on privacy (depends on exceptions created by member states)
National courts to take EU law into account. If you don’t agree with their interpretation of EU law, your option is to appeal or ask to refer questions to the EUCJ.
Just so you know, this also creates more load on other instances, especially the larger ones.
No, you got downvoted because you were insulting and incorrect.