![](https://lemmy.magnor.ovh/pictrs/image/50619a82-bdd5-4b5d-b626-4b68208777bb.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/a64z2tlDDD.png)
Since all instances mirror comments on subscribed communities you could simply create your own instance, leech it all and sell to LLMs. No need to go to the trouble of hosting a large instance.
Since all instances mirror comments on subscribed communities you could simply create your own instance, leech it all and sell to LLMs. No need to go to the trouble of hosting a large instance.
Don’t give him ideas. He’ll go there and do a BHL.
Holy shit is that article a heap of bigoted trash ramblings. I mean, I get that people disliked the series but this is full on Andrew Tate shit.
I’ve lost all hope for the US to do anything meaningful on topics such as disinformation. I mean, half of the people there vote for people who believe COVID is a hoax and the Jews are firing space lasers at people.
What I meant is that this is purely a power struggle within the Church. The main matter is not Trump but mostly loyalties within the Catholic church. That some bishops are insane enough to support people like Trump is a symptom (and a rather telling one) but not the dividing line here.
Religious conservatives are a breed apart that is for sure …
I understand some clerics did back Trump. It just seemed a bit weird to use this as the main qualifier here. But your point about some of them being removed stands, fair enough.
I don’t see why you would call any catholic leader “Trump loyal”. Trump has nothing to do with this (isn’t he supposed to be protestant btw?).
What’s happening is the Vatican apparently trying to clean itself up a bit. Not really sure if there is anything to expect from it but it’s a start.
Well, Adolf has to be up there.
Yup, exactly.
We should not kid ourselves: this is, as you said yourself, a grandfather clause. This was meant to slightly appease religious people post 1905. The historical value argument is, in most case, rather moot. Plenty of non religious buildings are older and have arguably more cultural value and yet are not maintained with public money.
Besides, the spirit of laïcité is being completely subverted lately. I mean, on the one hand we hear discourse such as is quoted in this article, and on the other our president is still chanoine de Latran. You’d think such staunch defenders of the separation between church and state would take issue with holding a clergy title…
As an addendum, one should keep in mind that in 2017 Macron ran on a platform that heavily criticized the left’s “obsession with laïcité”. What is happening today is pure unadulterated opportunism.
Absolutely. But incidentally most religious buildings dating from before 1905 are catholic or protestant. So this is not neutral. And some of those buildings have no real historical value per se, at least not any more than any other random building from that era.
deleted by creator
Actually the State does pay for a big part of church maintenance: link.
Well you should read this.
The state actually does pay for a big part of church maintenance.
I live in France. I have never encountered any instance of misleading packaging. No one is being fooled. This is a bullshit excuse made up by bullshit people. The meat industry is an extremely powerful lobby here, as is industrial agriculture, and this government is bending over backwards to accommodate their every whim.
I’m surprised he did not fall out of the plane’s window. I hear windows are very dangerous in Russia.
Gift it then. Depending on your local laws it might work.
Sell really cheap booze all over town. Like, 15c a gallon cheap. Advertise it on social media. Wait for a month or two. Profit.
Same thing here. What the fuck is this?