• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle


  • Okay so, this is a rhetoric problem.

    This phrase here:

    I disagree with the premise, the Holocaust was unique.

    You lost the crowd immediately. The thrust of Walz’ position is that people should be more aware of the ubiquity of genocidal thinking, and in your first sentence, you put yourself in opposition to him.

    Even though you agree with Walz later in spirit, the immediate impression is that you’re downplaying other genocides by over-fixating on the shock and horror of this one in particular, and it takes you way too long to clear up your position.

    If you had phrased this as “added context” or “an additional fun fact” or “some ways in which the holocaust was unique,” it becomes much harder to disagree with you. Your audience isn’t primed immediately to be angry, and you beget much more charitability, at least from those who aren’t insane.




  • Imaginary grenades.

    Having porn made of you is imaginary?

    At some point the “it’s just a game” also stops holding water…

    The video game doesn’t produce anything.

    AI is not the cause for generating deep fakes,

    DUIs can be reduced with public transportation. What do you propose reduces… porn fakes?

    Ain’t it interesting how coming up with a consistent framework, makes it applicable to different areas of life?

    Fucking lol.

    My problem with machine learning porn is that it’s artless generic template spam clogging up my feed of shit I actually want to see. But you know, to each their own.