“no right wing talking points” is hardly left wing.
“no right wing talking points” is hardly left wing.
Not left wing. Just left.
None of them are left wing (maybe Green has some left wing stuff?)
If something was written by V3 and then published, that text doesn’t get updated every time a new version of chatGPT comes out.
The text isn’t dynamic.
It could be a new level added to the peer review of work. Nothing to do with the university. Just “other professionals”.
A thesis isn’t just an exam, it’s a real scientific paper.
And usually claims is contents as fact, which can be referenced by others as fact.
And absolutely should be open to scrutiny so long as it is relevant.
Yeah but if your wrote your thesis in 2024, and the detector is run on it in 2026…
You’re probably busted.
It’s not like you’ll re-write your thesis with every major ChatGPT release.
I bet AI detection is going to get a lot better over time.
I wonder if there’s going to be retrospective testing of theses as time goes on.
Could really damage some careers down the line.
Edit: guys, retrospective testing means it was done later (i.e. with a more up to date AI detector).
Don’t get really drunk or stoned and end up being obnoxious.
Try to be aware of traffic (especially bikes) and of blocking sidewalks/alleys etc. Look both ways on every lane of traffic you cross (including both bike lanes).
Try to branch out your trip from the exact center of the city (or by the train station) and don’t rent an Airbnb inside the city center (they drive up local rents).
If you’re standing on red bricks or red tarmac, you’re probably blocking the bike lane.
If you can’t see the bike lane, it’s likely that you’re standing in it (they aren’t always marked).
It adds a lot more legitimacy to people protesting the crimes, which is important.
I like to call pair-programming sessions (for bugs) “bebuggery sessions” at work and people haven’t complained yet.
Ah yes, the American dream.
I imagine it’s more about discouraging any kind of official organising or institutional support/advertising.
Dangerous for politicians to promote it, or charities to give it resources/attention.
This keeps the scale of the boycott low enough to make less of a difference.
Also I guess it tries to shift those on the side of the ban to be the “moral authority”.
You get the first hundred a month for free.
Maybe you could ration it for when you need high-quality searches?
I’m trying out a paid Google called Kagi for a month.
It’s pretty good so far and very fast.
And no ads or SEO prioritisation, which is the key part.
Or tracking/data-retention, so they say (it’s not open source so we only have their word for it).
Yeah.
Do you mean “programmers” by developers?
Or do you mean “the people who are involved in the development of the app”?
Because the money & marketing people are the ones who want trackers.
But they are usually such a high prio for the app that it’s put them in or get fired.
Ahhh I bet it’s my duckduckgo filter app.
I guess that’s not working for me. I tried in a couple of browsers but no luck. Do you have the video URL?
Where’s the video? I can’t see one in the article
E-commerce isn’t as much of a monopoly as “reddit-style social media”.
Technically anyone has the ability to open an eshop and sell whatever they want (provided they follow the appropriate sales/tax laws etc).
It’s just that people don’t like to buy from no-name shops online, as reputations give a level of accountability.
I imagine a lot of people got their credit card details stolen when the first eshops appeared.
You know it’s a sliding scale, right?
There’s not just three choices.
There’s Far-side, side-wing, side, side-leaning, center-side for both (plus center).
Then you have fiscal Vs moral lean on both sides.