It’s apparently early in development, but there’s an ActivityPub implementation of wikis made by one of Lemmy’s dev.
PhD in aerospace engineering from Wallonia.
Docteur ingénieur en aérospatiale de Wallonie.
Docteur indjenieur e-n areyospåciå del Walonreye.
It’s apparently early in development, but there’s an ActivityPub implementation of wikis made by one of Lemmy’s dev.
Why wouldn’t the friends like it then?
What’s the marketing meaning? I only know about the psychological effect of feeling anxious when disconnected or not taking part to an event.
That’s exactly how it works right now with VDI. I’m using one at work.
I’ve not used it yet, but I plan to try photoprism at some point.
E: ah, just saw your edit about self host, sorry.
I think the idea of a megathread is to give the opportunity to avoid a topic that is flooding the community to people not interested.
Bedankt!
Nice machine! How does it turn the pages?
Depends if the rate of creation of the suspicious instances is higher than the mods can manage.
Two solutions that I see:
The dev seems to be working on an app for Tildes.
Of course. And I’ll continue to do so as long as advertisement is detrimental to my online experience. If it wastes my time by forcing me to watch an ad before a video, if it distracts me from reading a text because of animations, if it tries to scam or shock me, I’m better off blocking it. I’m not against advertisement as communication that a useful product or service exists, I’m against advertisement abuse and greed.
I’ll happily pay for, donate to, or otherwise support services important to me that need and deserve it.
Yes, good point. It’s more like: we as a society must decide what is and isn’t acceptable as far as free speech goes and enshrine this in law. Then it is a matter of applying the laws rather than judging case by case as individuals.
In this case, The political discourse of the devs doesn’t seem directly related to Lemmy’s development. Of course, libre software is very much in line with leftist ideology; what I mean is that they do not seem to impose their views or skew ours through their work as devs. They don’t even use their position as devs to publicize their discourse; people had to dig to find them.
If their political discourse is harmful, I’d argue that it is not to us, as individuals, to condemn them and to choose an adequate punishment, e.g. boycott the seemingly unrelated Lemmy project.
Of course, it is obviously to us, as individuals, to decide if we want to participate on Lemmy, or even donate to the devs for their work on Lemmy. I choose to do both even when I don’t agree with the devs and when I think their discourse about human right in the CCP and Russia might be harmful.
It seems to have become a habit that most good things about the internet is linked to the EU. I’m really grateful. That being said, I hope that Lemmy can become a collaborative project uniting a lot of devs rather than rely on two people.
About the scandal; as long as their opinions do not influence the platform I don’t see them as relevant to Lemmy. If they are illegal, let justice do its work.
Some people use quotes for emphasis, though. So, not sure if this faculty’s on our side.