For a minute I legit thought Italy had dropped a new pasta shape.
For a minute I legit thought Italy had dropped a new pasta shape.
Ok, but your “question” was basically “What’s something that makes you mad? Here’s mine:”
… no?
I see a lot of hype for a preferred candidate, but I don’t see anyone saying it’s over or their candidate has already won. I also see a lot of demonizing of opponents, but one party has literally nominated a rapist and convicted felon, and he’s most upset that people are calling him “weird.”
That’s March 14th, Albert Einstein’s birthday. But I don’t celebrate that, because I’m a Tauist.
Excuse you, sir, but you should be keeping the LEM in you hearts every day. And you call yourself an America. For shame.
I remember learning that 3.5" disks were still called “floppy” disks, despite being rigid plastic. My teacher took apart a disk and showed us how the inside was a film, but all that did was encourage us to take apart the disks and make desk toys out of the springs.
Man, I remember when Zip Disks were a big deal and a GB was a lot of storage.
Everything’s gonna be ok.
Trust me, I know what I’m doing.
You’ll understand when you’re older.
Hang on, almost figured it…
Caspar Babypants.
What did you think the babies were running from, comrade?
What’s the most verbose attempt to eschew obfuscation on record?
Some day you may not mind so much.
That’s why Congress doesn’t want to send more aid.
Gameplay balance.
Or, like you can unpause, but also everyone else can also pause. You’re just going about your day, eating some soup, and someone in India is in the middle of an exam and wants to take an extra moment to think.
So you and everyone else is frozen in time while they search their recollection for some bit of trivia they are supposed to know. Your spoon, full of yummy soup, is inches from your mouth, but you can’t even smell it because the air is paused, too. Time has stopped, but not your consciousness.
Unpause, your spoon finishes its trip to your mouth. Time pauses again before you get a chance to swallow, because someone in Canada is on a date and is nervous about asking too many questions.
This is life, now. Pause, unpause, pause, unpause, nobody knowing why or when someone else will hit pause, or how long it will last.
You’re right, same with bone and skin.
That’s fucked up. It must have been horrible to wake up to all of that.
As a ward of the state, he would have been assigned a case worker who would have been in charge of his care and end of life decisions. The TCs would have still tried to find next of kin or any family that could provide consent (and a medical and social history). Besides the legal implications, there’s also a PR consideration. Transplant organizations are keenly aware of the public perception, and they will go to any lengths to avoid the narrative that the state killed someone to steal their organs. If there was a third cousin in Germany, they would have gotten a phone call before decisions were made.
Just as a pro-tip, “No.” is a complete answer. You don’t need religious reasons.
I worked as a transplant coordinator, and we talked to a lot of different people from a lot of different religions. This is something I wish I could have said to everyone who ever told me no because of religious reasons: I really hope you don’t feel like you have to make up a reason.
We can start with, no organized religions specifically prohibit organ donation.
There are some religions, like Jehovah’s Witnesses, that probibit receiving blood transfusions, but organ donation doesn’t require blood transfusion, and the decision is left to the individual.
There are also some religions and folklore that believe the body must remain intact after death, but those beliefs are not consistent or particularly widespread. Some Shinto believers refuse donation to avoid angering the spirits of the dead, but that’s also an individual choice rather than an official position.
So when we would discuss how to approach people of varying faiths, it was important to understand the underlying reasons for objections to donations. It’s also important to recognize that, despite what is on your license, it’s really not up to you. The transplant coordinator is talking to your next of kin, and they will be the one making the final decision. If I’m talking to you about donation, it’s because someone close to you has died, and we’re not discussing your beliefs. We will discuss what they would have wanted.
Nine times out of ten, when someone would cite religious objections, they were not members of an obscure Roma group or Shinto practitioners. We do have a significant number of Jehovah’s Witnesses in our region, and our consent rates were roughly the same for those families. That might be different depending on where you live.
Far more likely for our region, people were using “religious reasons” as a social trump card that gives them an out without looking selfish. Donation is an uncomfortable concept for a lot of people, and you’re talking to them at one of the worst times in their lives. Not everyone is up for having that conversation, and any transplant coordinator will understand when someone says “no.” Still, a lot of people think they will get pressured to do something they aren’t confortable with, and will make arguments they think “win” the discussion in the shortest amount of time.
The key is, I’m not going to tell you what you believe. I’m not your spiritual advisor or religious leader. I can help navigate those waters if asked, but if you say you have religious objections, I don’t need to know what they are. You don’t want to donate.
When I spoke with families, I was advocating for the people waiting for a transplant. There are people living better lives today because I was able to persuade donor families to overcome their objections. My second priority was making the process as comfortable for the families as possible. It made no difference to me whether those objections were religious or personal. If someone wanted to talk about it, we’d talk about it. If they couldn’t, we didn’t.
Others have mentioned in this thread that donors are exceptionally rare. Few people die in a way that makes donation possible. So when they do, their families are presented a unique situation where they are in a position to help others. Most people will help other people when they can, but the ones that don’t aren’t lesser humans. It isn’t selfish to say that it’s too much, too painful, too disturbing to think about. Because it is. You’re in the acute phase of a significant loss. You do not need to justify your feelings, and you should not feel defensive about what you want for your loved one.
If you don’t want to talk to someone about donation, you can just say “No.”
You can donate your organs, if you die of a head injury. You cannot donate tissues like bone, skin, or corneas, because those are considered “life enhancing.” Donated tissue has a similar restriction to donated blood, so you’re right about that bit.
Organs like the kidneys, liver, heart, lung, pancreas, and stomach are “life saving” and don’t have any restrictions. When you die, you’ll be evaluated for any potential donation, and if you are a candidate for donating organs, someone will come talk to your family about it. Talk to your family about what you would want.
Perplexica? What sort of sauce goes with that?